Why Traditional Monitoring Falls Short

• Inaccurate or inconsistent data

• Poor installation practices

• Limited QA/QC and validation

• Low confidence in results

• Data gaps and communication failures

• Misalignment between depth and velocity

• Uncertainty in decision-making

A Structured, End-to-End Approach

1. Hydraulic site selection

2. Expert installation

3. Continuous QA/QC and validation

4. Real-time monitoring and anomaly detection

5. Verification of depth–velocity relationship

6. Ongoing maintenance and performance checks

7. Delivery of actionable insights

Managed Service & Support

• 99.95% data availability

• Hydraulic validation of sites

• Continuous calibration

• Real-time alerts and insights

Comparison (optional visual table):
DaaS vs Traditional Monitoring

• Reliable vs Variable data

• Continuous vs Periodic calibration

• Real-time insights vs Raw data only

Advanced Monitoring Technology

Detectronic MSFM AV Flow Meter

• High-performance for sewer environments

• Intrinsically safe (ATEX & IECEx certified)

• Reliable, precise measurements

Connectivity & Data

• Integrated 4G communications

• Real-time data via DetectData platform

• Continuous visibility of network performance